Symptom validity testing in medically unexplained pain: a chronic regional pain syndrome type 1 case series.

This study examines validity findings in a particular behavioral pain disorder. We examined two types of validity scores in 73 participants with a primary diagnosis of the controversial Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I (CRPS-1). All participants were incentivized by a disability-seeking context. Failure rates on performance validity tests ranged from 23% (Test of Memory Malingering) to 50% (Reliable Digit Span). Positive findings on symptom validity tests (MMPI-2 or MMPI-2-RF) ranged from 15% to 50% of subsamples. At least 75% of the sample failed one performance validity indicator and over half showed at least one positive symptom validity score. This initial study suggests that CRPS-1 could serve as a good patient model for studying the role of simulation in pain-related disability.

MMPI-2 validity scores in defense- versus plaintiff-selected examinations: a repeated measures study of examiner effects.

The effects of forensic examiner role on validity scores have rarely been studied empirically. We used a repeated measures design to examine the association between examiner role (plaintiff- and defense-selected neuropsychologists) and scores on eight Minnesota Multiphasic Inventory-2 validity scores (MMPI-2-VRIN, -TRIN, -L, -K, -F, -Fb, -Fp, and -FBS) of the same 80 individuals. All 80 were involved in litigation following mostly minor neurological injuries. We found no significant within-group differences on any of the MMPI-2 validity scales. Concordance of pass/fail rates between examinations was above 80%, except for MMPI-2-Fb. For example, the Symptom Validity Scale (MMPI-2-FBS) showed equivalently high failure rates (70%) during both examinations. This study does not support the view that examiner role affects symptom validity scores in forensic settings.

Test of memory malingering and word memory test: a new comparison of failure concordance rates.

Two commonly used symptom validity tests are the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) and Word Memory Test (WMT). After examining TOMM-WMT failure concordance rates, Green [Green, P. (2007). Making comparisons between forced-choice effort tests. In K. B. Boone (Ed.), Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment (pp. 50-77). New York: Guilford] urged widespread adoption of the WMT, arguing the TOMM is insensitive to feigned impairment. But Green (2007) used a skewed concordance method that favored WMT (one TOMM subtest vs. three WMT subtests). In the present study we compare pass/fail agreement rates with different combinations of TOMM and WMT subtests in 473 persons seeking compensation for predominately mild neurological trauma. We replicated Green (2007) using his asymmetrical method, but otherwise we found the WMT and TOMM produce comparable failure rates in samples at-risk for exaggeration with balanced comparison (three TOMM subtests vs. three WMT). Further work is necessary to compare WMT and TOMM specificities, as failure concordance designs establish reliability but are insufficient for proving validity.

Validity testing in dually diagnosed post-traumatic stress disorder and mild closed head injury.

Prospects for the coexistence of post-traumatic stress syndrome (PTSS) and mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) rely exclusively on subjective evidence, increasing the risk of response bias in a compensatable social context. Using a priori specificities derived from genuine brain disorder groups, we examined validity failure rates in three domains (symptom, cognitive, motor) in 799 persons reporting persistent subjective disability long after mild neurological injury. Validity tests included the Test of Memory Malingering, MMPI-2 Fake Bad Scale, and Infrequency (F) scales, reliable digit span, and Halstead-Reitan finger tapping. Analyses showed invalidity signs in large excess of actuarial expectations, with rising invalidity risk conditional on post-traumatic complexity; the highest failure rates were produced by the 95 persons reporting both neurogenic amnesia and re-experiencing symptoms. We propose an "over-endorsement continuum" hypothesis: The more complex the post-traumatic presentation after mild neurological injury, the stronger the association with response bias. Late-appearing dual diagnosis is a litigation phenomenon so intertwined with secondary gain as to be a byproduct of it.

The Fake Bad Scale and MMPI-2 F-family in detection of implausible psychological trauma claims.

We tested the validity of the Lees-Haley Fake Bad Scale (FBS) and the family of MMPI-2 F scales (F-family; F, F(p), and F-K scales) in predicting improbable psychological trauma claims in an applied setting. Litigants reporting implausible symptoms long after minor scares and nonlitigants clinically referred following severe stressors completed the MMPI-2. Both groups were naturally matched on social class. The FBS demonstrated sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive power in the detection of atypical problems but the F-family showed poor utility. FBS cutting scores derived from logistic regression were applied to a third group made up of litigants with histories of undeniably severe traumas. A substantial number of this third group scored above cutoffs for exaggeration, but this finding is ambiguous. Reasons for the F-family's insensitivity to real-world exaggeration may include using student simulators for validation and content reflective of psychotic simulation. The superiority of the FBS in applied forensic settings could derive from its development in actual litigants and content reflective of nonpsychotic exaggerations. The FBS appears acceptable for use in applied forensic settings where persons seek compensation for nonpsychotic syndromes.

Premorbid clues? Preinjury scholastic performance and present neuropsychological functioning in late postconcussion syndrome.

Neuropsychologists rely on demographic variables to form assumptions about premorbid status, and most use years of education as the main variable. School records are a more objective basis for such estimation, particularly in litigated cases. In the present study, final cumulative grade point average (GPA) was regressed on to Halstead-Reitan Battery (HRB), IQ and other neuropsychological test scores in 60 nonmalingering postconcussive litigants and 17 litigants with moderate-severe closed head injury. Results indicated significant correlations between GPA, HRB core tests, commonly used neuropsychological measures, and intelligence. A regression formula indicated litigants with poor grade point average were likely to perform in the impaired range. The present findings suggest the quality of premorbid academic performance also provides an important context in which to view present neuropsychological performance. Marginal premorbid achievement may be a risk factor for late developing postconcussion syndrome and litigation.

The fake bad scale in atypical and severe closed head injury litigants.

The correlational and diagnostic properties of Lees-Haley's MMPI-2 Fake Bad Scale (FBS) were examined in litigating atypical minor, litigating moderate-severe, and non-litigating moderate-severe head injury samples. Overall, the FBS was sensitive to both litigation status and nonconforming versus conforming symptom courses. The FBS appeared superior to the MMPI-2 F and F-K scales in differentiating atypical from real brain-injury outcomes. High FBS scorers also had higher scores on somatic complaining (Hs, Hy) and to a lesser degree with psychotic complaints (F, Pa, Sc). FBS showed significant associations with various neuropsychological symptom validity measures. FBS appears to capture a hybrid of infrequent symptom reporting styles with an emphasis on unauthentic physical complaints. However, FBS also correlated with documented abnormal neurological signs within a litigating moderate-severe brain-injury group. Its use as a symptom infrequency measure may have to be modified in more severe injury litigants, as some FBS items may reflect true long-term outcome in severe cerebral dysfunction.

Neuropsychological and psychosocial correlates of adult arithmetic deficiency.

The purpose of this study was to examine adult correlates of rule-derived arithmetic deficiency. The authors collected neuropsychological, handedness, gender, and psychosocial data of adults with stringently defined arithmetic deficiency (AD; N = 45), reading deficiency (N = 45), and dual deficiency (N = 45). The authors did not match groups on IQ score and did not restrict analyses to right-handed men. The results indicated that AD in adults is associated with nonverbal reasoning and constructional problems. Otherwise, there was no association between AD and dysphoric complaints as defined by Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory elevations. The authors also found overall intelligence was lower in adults with AD, and gender distribution differed markedly from the reading and dual deficient groups. Potential gender bias in remediation referral patterns was identified.

Actual versus self-reported scholastic achievement of litigating postconcussion and severe closed head injury claimants.

Psychologists typically rely on patients' self-report of premorbid status in litigated settings. The authors examined the fidelity between self-reported and actual scholastic performance in litigating head injury claimants. The data indicated late postconcussion syndrome (LPCS) and severe closed head injury litigants retrospectively inflated scholastic performance to a greater degree than nonlitigating control groups. The LPCS group showed the highest magnitude of grade inflation, but discrepancy scores did not significantly correlate with a battery of malingering measures or with objective cerebral dysfunction. These findings support previous studies, which showed self-report is not a reliable basis for estimation of preinjury cognitive status. Retrospective inflation may represent a response shift bias shaped by an adversarial context rather than a form of malingering.